Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!helios!genetti
From: genetti@cs.tamu.edu (Jon Genetti)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: How well does Barnsley's system perform?
Message-ID: <4935@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Date: 12 Apr 90 23:52:54 GMT
References: <1935@speedy.mcnc.org> <3166@usceast.UUCP> <1571@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <35410@brunix.UUCP> <13652@cgl.ucsf.EDU> <5538@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <6277@odin.corp.sgi.com>
Sender: usenet@helios.TAMU.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
Lines: 10

In article <6277@odin.corp.sgi.com> robert@sgi.com writes:
>I don't think the reviewers can predict from the paper whether a 
>person's presentation will be offensive.  They can only judge
>the contents of the paper itself.  
>
What content of the paper?  Everything in the paper had already been
published more than once in various journals.  I guess SIGGRAPH wanted 
to "protect itself" in case this happens to be a revolutionary idea.

jon genetti.