Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!news From: flee@shire.cs.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Is it time for comp.lang.c.dos? Message-ID: Date: 9 Apr 90 16:32:04 GMT References: <1990Mar29.224413.21552@xenitec.on.ca> <1990Mar31.153231.4926@druid.uucp> <1990Apr3.091427.19910@kfw.COM> <1990Apr5.191012.26651@druid.uucp> <403:Apr901:26:4290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu> <456@wattres.UUCP> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Distribution: usa Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 11 Steve Watt asks: >It is called COMP.SYS.IBM.PC.PROGRAMMER!!!!!! >But *why* can't we get people to use it???? ``I'm having a problem with malloc() in Utah.'' The problem has nothing to do with Utah (I hope), but where is the defect? Is it my understanding of malloc, my understanding of C, my Zortech C compiler, my copy of GNU malloc, my Amiga computer, my homebrew operating system, my extended memory board, or my neighbor's cat? -- Felix Lee flee@shire.cs.psu.edu *!psuvax1!flee