Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!arizona!dave
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (David P. Schaumann)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Is it time for comp.lang.c.dos?
Message-ID: <217@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 9 Apr 90 20:41:10 GMT
References: <1990Mar29.224413.21552@xenitec.on.ca> <403:Apr901:26:4290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 18

In article <403:Apr901:26:4290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu>, brnstnd@stealth.acf.nyu.edu writes:
> In article <W+Q2+T1xds13@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
> > In my arrogant opinion...
> > 	this discussion no longer has any bearing on comp.lang.c.
> 
> IMNSFHO the DOS-specific questions should be separated out in the first
> place, perhaps into comp.lang.c.dos. Anyone like this enough to start a
> call for discussion in news.groups?
> 
> ---Dan

Perhaps you have noticed many already do put some flags in the subject line
like "TC bug" or "farmalloc".  Once you learn to recognize all the magic
words that mean Three Initial Corperation, all you need to do is exercise
your 'n' key.

Dave Schaumann
dave@cs.arizona.edu