Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!bu.edu!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Is it time for comp.lang.c.dos?
Message-ID: <5638@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 10 Apr 90 17:22:35 GMT
References: <1990Mar29.224413.21552@xenitec.on.ca> <403:Apr901:26:4290@stealth.acf.nyu.edu> <217@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: comp.lang.c
Distribution: usa
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 23

In article <217@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> dave@cs.arizona.edu (David P. Schaumann) writes:
>> In article <W+Q2+T1xds13@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>>In my arrogant opinion...
>>>this discussion no longer has any bearing on comp.lang.c.
>
>Perhaps you have noticed many already do put some flags in the subject line
>like "TC bug" or "farmalloc".  Once you learn to recognize all the magic
>words that mean Three Initial Corperation, all you need to do is exercise
>your 'n' key.

Or do this in your kill-file (or whatever your news-reading software
allows):

    /zortech/j
    /ibm/j
    /turbo/j
    /microsoft/j
    /ms-dos/j

I'm sure there are others you can think of...

				--Blair
				  "Now let's not get personal..."