Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!charyb!dan
From: dan@kfw.COM (Dan Mick)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: UNIX C-compiler
Message-ID: <1990Apr12.215127.11250@kfw.COM>
Date: 12 Apr 90 21:51:27 GMT
References: <639822260.25952@minster.york.ac.uk>
Reply-To: dan@kfw.com (Dan Mick)
Organization: KFW Corporation, Newbury Park, CA
Lines: 9

In article <639822260.25952@minster.york.ac.uk> mike@minster.york.ac.uk writes:
>I agree with Peter da Silva: if it hasn't got "make", give it a miss (OK,
>so TurboC has, but not to the UNIX standard :-)

Mike, what *are* you talking about?  What features do you use in UNIX Make that
aren't supported by Turbo Make?

Now, if you'd been talking about the original Microsoft Make, I'd understand...
but I find Turbo Make to be the closest thing to UNIX Make I normally use...