Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!fred.cs.washington.edu!machaffi
From: machaffi@fred.cs.washington.edu (Scott MacHaffie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
Message-ID: <11423@june.cs.washington.edu>
Date: 13 Apr 90 01:06:15 GMT
References: <20083@megaron.cs.arizona.edu>
Sender: news@cs.washington.edu
Reply-To: machaffi@fred.cs.washington.edu.cs.washington.edu (Scott MacHaffie)
Organization: c programmers?
Lines: 11

In article <20083@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) writes:
>Obviously the triple method is only intended to be used for code
>developement, the finished product would be compiled without bounds
>checks of any kind.

So, you suggest that people ship code which they haven't tested?  If people
are testing code with bounds checking turned on and sell it with bounds
checking turned off, they're going to have problems.


		Scott MacHaffie