Xref: utzoo comp.arch:15266 comp.misc:8654 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.misc Subject: Re: Single user vs. shared (was Re: Message-ID: <0+R20W2ggpc2@ficc.uu.net> Date: 7 Apr 90 19:33:08 GMT References: <52817@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <76700181@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <11731@nlm-mcs.arpa> <1087@lupine.UUCP> <1990Mar25.003440.8237@world.std.com> <10395@cbmvax.commodore.com> <009349B3.1DCCC880@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Followup-To: comp.misc Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 11 In article <009349B3.1DCCC880@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) writes: > Well bud, if you can do that, howcome Commodore Sales and Marketing haven't > gotten off their tushies to advocate these wonderful little gems? Commodore Sales and Marketing couldn't sell a $30 Sparc-I clone. If they were selling Sushi, they'd call it "cold, dead fish". Commodore Sales and Marketing has taken the amazing (and they are amazing) things that have come out of Commodore Engineering and convinced everyone it's a bigger Commodore-64. That's howcome. This has little to do with comp.arch anymore. Please followup elsewhere. -- _--_|\ `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . / \ 'U` \_.--._/ v