Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!dsac.dla.mil!dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil!dsacg2.dsac.dla.mil!nfs1675 From: nfs1675@dsacg2.dsac.dla.mil (Michael Figg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: questions Summary: Some answers Keywords: new user Message-ID: <2024@dsacg2.dsac.dla.mil> Date: 6 Apr 90 13:42:05 GMT References: <10861@wpi.wpi.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center, Columbus Lines: 47 In article <10861@wpi.wpi.edu>, jstorey@wpi.wpi.edu (John R Storey) writes: > > Oops - forgot two questions: > > 1) Word proceesors. Being a college student, I often > have to write reports. I have seen ProWrite for the > Amiga and was suitably impressed, but it would > Try looking at Word Perfect. I don't know much about word processing but it sounds like theirs is farely solid. I also think somebody here or someplace mentioned that they had a student discount price of about $90. > 2) One of the main things that attracted me to the > Amiga was walking into Software Etc. and noticing > that there were books published by Commodore itself > These would probably be the Rom Kernal Manuals from Addison- Wesley. It sounds like the new v1.3 ones are very good and being v1.3 they shouldn't be out of date - yet. V1.4 is probably (hopefully) right around the corner and it sounds like there will be enough changes to warrent a new release of the manuals. I'm debating whether to wait for new ones. I have a couple of the Abacus books and they are very good at detail and examples, but I'm not that wild about their writing style. Rob Peck's book "Programmers Guide to the Amiga" seems to be a favorite of many although it is slightly dated and doesn't have as many examples as the Abacus books. Rob does do a very good job (IMO) with discussion on the principles. > 3) I have heard that there are some problems with the > memory protection on an Amiga. It isn't that there are some problems but that there is a lack of a MMU on the 68000. It seems that since most personal computers are not multi-tasking they do not need MMU's and the bigger machines that do have multi-tasking run on a chip that does have or supports memory management. We are sort of (happily for the most part) caught in the middle. I don't think there are that many problems with machines crashing from poor memory management, and when there is it is more a problem of poorly written applications that the OS itself.