Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!arizona!dave From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (David P. Schaumann) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Commodore, Amiga, Apple, and MAC Message-ID: <212@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> Date: 8 Apr 90 21:31:22 GMT References: <23800@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson Lines: 38 In article <23800@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas) writes: ]In article mwm@raven.pa.dec.com (Mike (Real Amigas have keyboard garages) Meyer) writes: ]>Much as some Amiga users may hate to admit it, the difference between ]>preemptive and non-preemptive multitasking isn't that great from the ]>users point of view. ] ]Well, I take exception to that on a theoretical level at any rate. Now, it's ]true that WP programs may not need preemptive multitasking, but then WP ]programs don't need multitasking. ] ]Now, when do *I* use multitasking? ]WHen I'm doing downloading and/or playing music [on my computer, silly] while ]programming, etc. ] ]Under these circumstances, MultiFinder doesn't cut it for the obvious reasons. ] ]I think that it's not so much that multitasking programs don't need preemptive ]multitasking, but that the current manner of programming doesn't teach you to ]think in concurrent ways, and so preemptiveness isn't so obvious. ] ]>