Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!cmcl2!dasys1!ssegan
From: ssegan@dasys1.uucp (Sascha Segan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Flight Simulators
Summary: More additions to f-18...
Message-ID: <1990Apr8.184831.23456@dasys1.uucp>
Date: 8 Apr 90 18:48:31 GMT
References: <4772@paperboy.OSF.ORG> <521.25f78579@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu> <90073.151125JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: The BIG ELECTRIC CAT, New York City, NY USA
Lines: 23

In article <90073.151125JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu>, JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu (JKT) writes:
> By the way, we (my roomies and I) have developed a wish list for
> F/A-18 II, or whatever it will be called:
> 
>    - A different city.  San Francisco was a great choice for the
>         first one, but I have now explored every square mile of the
>         available terrain.  May I suggest NYC as the next city?
>    - (of course) More scenarios.
>    - Modification of what happens when you ditch in the ocean.
>         Don't just have the plane sit there at 0 knots.  Make it sink!
>    - A "turbine failure" would immediately assume you no longer have
>         thrust - so make it that way - don't just freeze the throttle
>         and pitch controls!
>    - Make the working ceiling more than 40960 feet.  How about if you
>         go higher than 60000 feet you get a flame out?
> 
> Please add to this list!  :-)
> 
Also nice would be:
   - If some of the missions started from the ground bases instead of that stupid carrier. 
   - If you could destroy the scenery ( ie blow up buildings, etc.)
   - Have the maker be creative - maybe a UFO or something.
(a friend is using this account. DO NOT ATTEMPT to reply to this post. Violators will be eaten.)