Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!mmdf From: kosma%stc-sun@stc.lockheed.com (Monty Kosma) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: A rough future for the Amiga??? I think not. Message-ID: <16409@snow-white.udel.EDU> Date: 10 Apr 90 19:52:57 GMT Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU Lines: 32 From: Andy Finkel Date: 9 Apr 90 17:48:23 GMT In article <1990Apr8.013940.12984@wam.umd.edu> ddev@wam.umd.edu (Don DeVoe) writes: >use coprocessors to help relieve the main processor. No. The actual quote is >as follows: "...It is also the first personal computer to have two >additional processors - with the power of two additional personal computers - >to manage the flow of information inside." Now consider: Do the Amiga's >blitter, copper, etc. themselves have the power of additional personal >computers??? Nope, they don't. The IIfx uses, I believe, two 6502 to The Amiga 500, 1000 and 2000 each have a 6502 as well as a 68000. (the A2500 has a 6502, a 68000, and a 68020 or 68030; however, since the 68000 and 68020/030 are not active at the same time) To get a machine with two additional processors, we'd have to go back to the C128D, which its 6510, its Z80, and its 6502 running the disk drive. andy -- andy finkel {uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy Commodore-Amiga, Inc. "Not everything worth doing is worth doing well." Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share. I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors. what about the Z80 on my A2090? Doesn't that count for anything?