Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!terminator!dabo.ifs.umich.edu!rees
From: rees@dabo.ifs.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: Response to the DM fonts to X fonts question
Message-ID: <1990Apr9.170149.2524@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Date: 9 Apr 90 17:01:49 GMT
References: <256@camdev.UUCP> <49b35c3a.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Sender: usenet@terminator.cc.umich.edu (usenet news)
Reply-To: rees@citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
Organization: University of Michigan IFS Project
Lines: 11

In article <49b35c3a.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>, oj@apollo.HP.COM (Ellis
Oliver Jones) writes:
> I had some problems when I tried Steve Scott's procedure, so here are
> my clarifications of it:
> 

I had some problems too.  I discovered that X ignored the inter-character
spacing and put all the glyphs right next to each other.  To fix this I
changed the inter-character spacing (under "font params") to 0, then
increased the printing width of all the glyphs by the former inter-character
spacing (this can be done with "all glyphs" under the "font" menu).