Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!apollo!oj
From: oj@apollo.HP.COM (Ellis Oliver Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: X11R4 libs,clients running with Xapollo(R3) - good,bad,ugly?
Summary: good!
Message-ID: <49bd6a7c.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Date: 11 Apr 90 14:33:00 GMT
References: <1990Apr11.120831.21121@ecf.utoronto.ca>
Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM
Reply-To: oj@apollo.hp.com
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 12

In article <1990Apr11.120831.21121@ecf.utoronto.ca> apollo@ecf.utoronto.ca (Vince Pugliese) writes:
>What
>we were hoping to do was to build the R4 lib's
>and clients but retain the R3-based Xapollo
>server that Apollo ships.

We've done quite a bit of this around here, Vince.  
It works fine, as long as the R4 client code you use
doesn't depend on R4-only features, such as the
Shape extension.

/oj