Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mephisto!ncsuvx!news
From: wall-rt@cscosl.ncsu.edu (Richard Todd Wall)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Extended & Expanded memory Questions
Message-ID: <1990Apr9.234033.7308@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>
Date: 9 Apr 90 23:40:33 GMT
Organization: Operating Systems Laboratory (OSL), NCSU, Raleigh NC
Lines: 14


	I was working on a 386 SX machine with 2 meg. of memory and
running Quarterdeck Expanded Memory Manager.  The machine's memory was
set up with 640k base memory, 512k extended, and 512k expanded.  When
we ran PC Lab's Benchmark test of the memory the rusult was that 
the 640K memory was faster than the expanded, and the expanded was
faster than the extended.  Does any one know why this is???  Or was
benchmark wrong????


o o ______           _     _____  _  _ o o          mcnc!bacchus!beretta!todd
' '   /       /   / ' )   /      // // ' '    or    wall-rt@cscosl.ncsu.edu
     / ______/ __/   / / / __.  // //   
   _/ (_) (_/_(_/_  (_(_/ (_/|_</_</_               Durham, North Carolina