Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!bu.edu!bucsf.bu.edu!eggbert From: eggbert@bucsf.bu.edu (Eugene Wang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Subject: Re: msc 6.0 problems Message-ID: Date: 10 Apr 90 20:31:21 GMT References: <4041@sage.cc.purdue.edu> Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu Organization: Boston University Lines: 17 In-reply-to: sru@sage.cc.purdue.edu's message of 10 Apr 90 19:10:29 GMT >>>> On 10 Apr 90 19:10:29 GMT, sru@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Charles Sinnett) said: > I sure hope that that Quarterdeck decides to fix QEMM386, since it is an > awesome product, but I might have to find a substitute so I upgrade my > compiler.... Why are we assumming that this is Quarterdeck/Qualitas' problems. What has Microsoft done to make HIMEM.SYS incompatible? Quarterdeck and Qualitas essentially make the only commercial extended memory managers around, and to have MSC 6.0 incompatible with BOTH of them? I think Quarterdeck, Qualitas AND Microsoft should work out a solution. The problem should be Microsoft's. They know it's incompatible and what have they done? Just wondering, Eugene Wang eggbert@bucsf.bu.edu