Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixd.cc.columbia.edu!srg
From: srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Steven R Gerber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: DOS 4.0 versus DOS 3.3 ... so?
Keywords: DOS4.0, DOS3.3, why, why not
Message-ID: <1990Apr14.175038.978@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 14 Apr 90 17:50:38 GMT
References: <1J37g2w161w@cattie.UUCP> <3334@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> <3444@trantor.harris-atd.com> <650@ssc.UUCP>
Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News)
Reply-To: srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Steven R Gerber)
Distribution: na
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 19

In article <650@ssc.UUCP> fyl@ssc.UUCP (Phil Hughes) writes:
>[discussion of why DOS 4.01 is great and/or a dog deleted]
>
>This brings up the question: is there a way to work with bigger partitions
>under DOS 3.3?
>
>-- 
>Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155  (206)FOR-UNIX
>     uunet!pilchuck!ssc!fyl or attmail!ssc!fyl            (206)527-3385

Use OnTrack's DiskManager software.  It's great.

****************************************************************
*	Steven R. Gerber - PAL (Programmer At Large)
*	srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu
*	Tel:	212-794-8721
*	UUCP:	...rutgers!columbia!cunixd!srg
*	FAX:	212-794-8722
****************************************************************