Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!bush
From: bush@acsu.Buffalo.EDU (christophe e bush)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandy
Subject: Re: Tandy 1000SL info
Message-ID: <21629@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 12 Apr 90 12:08:55 GMT
References: <90543@philabs.Philips.Com> <652@vela.acs.oakland.edu>
Sender: nobody@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Organization: SUNY at Buffalo
Lines: 14

In article <652@vela.acs.oakland.edu> mdchewni@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Mark D. Chewning) writes:
>For those of you not in touch with reality, the TANDY 1000sl's upgrade to 640K 
>costs 120 bucks, not 150 as of 1/1/90, unless a manager is trying to screw you.
>Mark Chewning
> 
True, (see my previous posting).  However why quibble over the 30 bucks R.S.
lowered their price by when you can by the same chips for 5 bucks each or less.
I don't think a R.S. manager would intentionally try to screw anyone for the
extra 30 (I used to be one).  I don't want to bash the company I used to work
for, especially since I am the proud owner of one of their machines, however
their memory pricing is rather extreme in light of recent trends in the memory
chip market.

Chris Bush