Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!oregon!milton!gwangung
From: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: DTP Publications (was Re: 'Publish')
Message-ID: <2798@milton.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 90 06:19:30 GMT
References: <8855@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <35850@cci632.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwangung@milton.acs.washington.edu (Roger Tang)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 10


	Can someone point me exactly in what areas the new PUBLISH makeover
is intrinsically bad?

	I glanced over it at the newsstand, and while I agree that it was
change strictly for the sake of change, I can't point out exactly what
is BAD about it (aside from all the ads cramming into page space and
sorta running counter to the new philosophy, such as it is....).  I'm not
being sarcastic; I just want to know for my own growing sense of layout
and design.