Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!indetech!fiver!palowoda From: palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: Interactive 386 and PC-Server Module Message-ID: <1039@fiver.UUCP> Date: 8 Apr 90 04:49:31 GMT References: <1990Apr7.025820.29699@ddsw1.MCS.COM> Organization: Fiver Communications Fremont, Ca Lines: 36 From article <1990Apr7.025820.29699@ddsw1.MCS.COM>, by karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger): > In article <1990Apr6.174231.2758@cti-software.nl> pim@cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen) writes: >> >>How does PC-Interface compare to PC-NFS with ISC's TCP/IP & NFS ? > > PC-NFS takes more memory on the DOS machine, and can't access pipe files. > Thus, no "fast" printer support like we have built for PCI. > > Also, I have heard (but not confirmed) that PC-NFS doesn't get along with MS > Windows, which would be a killer. We >need< that in order to do our desktop > publishing. > > Lastly, PC-NFS is only available from SUN, not ISC. I hate getting in > finger-pointing battles, and would prefer to buy the software from one > source so I can complain to one place when it doesn't work. Yeah! So if every buys software and hardware from Karl we can all call him and complain to him. :-) It would be nice if there was another source for PC-NFS just as a second source. Some companies absoulutely require this before buying a product. Dosn't FTP Accociates have a PC-NFS product? I don't know, I'm useing Windows and NFS on ESIX and it's working. I had problems with certain disk controllers at one time. Some RLL controllers are not compatible. But than again if there where some reasonable cost effective desktop publishing software for UNIX I wouldn't need PC-NFS. But in the interim Sun's product dosn't seem that bad. ---Bob -- Bob Palowoda palowoda@fiver | *Home of Fiver BBS* Home {sun}!ys2!fiver!palowoda | 415-623-8809 1200/2400 {pacbell}!indetech!fiver!palowoda | An XBBS System Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda| 415-623-8806 1200/2400/19.2k TB+