Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!uflorida!novavax!hcx1!brad
From: brad@SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM (Brad Appleton)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Integrated editing and compiling with vi
Summary: small C programs are okay but dont send mcc!
Keywords: vi, awk/sed/perl, error message parsing & inserting
Message-ID: <3697@hcx1.SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM>
Date: 10 Apr 90 22:04:51 GMT
References: <3620@hcx1.SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM> <9000029@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <3661@hcx1.SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM>
Sender: news@hcx1.SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM
Organization: Harris Computer Systems, Fort Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 26

In article <3661@hcx1.SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM> brad@SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM (Brad Appleton) writes:
>
>I do NOT want a C program (I have one already). Please do not tell me how
>emacs can already do all this - I know that.

I will make a modification to this: C programs that arent mega-huge are
acceptable.  But PLEASE dont send me yet-another-message about mcc. I
have mcc (as well as a C program of my own). C programs will have a 
definite edge in execution speed over scripts however and I didnt 
want all you one-liner Guru's out there to be cheated by that. I will
take this into consideration when analyzing any submissions!!!

I should also add that it would be "nice" if your script properly handles
cases where an error message may occur in a file that was included by
the source file. This message should be inserted into the .h file 
and remainig messages should go into the .c file. The mcc that I have 
does not quite handle this case properly.
>
>Please send e-mail! Post only if your e-mail bounces! I will summarize.

Oh yeah -- and keep your scripts coming ... I only have a few thus far!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "And miles to go before I sleep." =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Brad Appleton         Harris Computer Systems         brad@ssd.csd.harris.com
 (305) 973-5007        Fort Lauderdale, FL USA        {uunet,novavax}!hcx1!brad
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Disclaimer: I said it, not my company! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-