Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!indetech!fiver!palowoda
From: palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: License Management Facility (LMF)
Message-ID: <1040@fiver.UUCP>
Date: 11 Apr 90 03:49:24 GMT
References: <54695@bbn.COM>
Organization: Fiver Communications  Fremont, Ca
Lines: 23

From article <54695@bbn.COM>, by fkittred@bbn.com (Fletcher Kittredge):
> In article <00934FDA.44D76CA0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) writes:
> ...
[discussion about LMF set aside]

> just got to market a few months earlier by offering a limited product.  What
> you ought to be doing is beating up DEC for offering a non-networking,
> non-standard product.

   Hmm, now this sounds interesting.  How does DEC networking products
get along with other networks such as SUN's, HP's and maybe UNIX 3.2
on 386 PC's? What is this "non-networking" or "non-standard"? 
Dosn't DEC have a standard TCP/IP implementation with the ULTRIX product?
Are there any problems useing DEC's networks when working with X-windows
to another OS say's SUN's?  

---Bob

-- 
Bob Palowoda   palowoda@fiver              |   *Home of Fiver BBS*
Home {sun}!ys2!fiver!palowoda              | 415-623-8809 1200/2400
     {pacbell}!indetech!fiver!palowoda     |     An XBBS System                
Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda| 415-623-8806 1200/2400/19.2k TB+