Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!richard From: richard@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: "ld -l" == "ld -la" -- why? Message-ID: <2191@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 10 Apr 90 17:47:48 GMT References: <1990Apr3.194823.5038@athena.mit.edu> <12504@smoke.BRL.MIL> <3142@auspex.auspex.com> Reply-To: richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin) Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 13 In article <3142@auspex.auspex.com> guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes: >For those of you who are wondering "what the hell is 'liba.a'?", it was, >as I remember, a library of routines usable from assembler-language >programs (hence the "a" in "liba", just as with the "c" in "libc"). And in particular (according to cc(I) in the Sixth Edition manual) it contained assembler routines used by C routines in libc.a. -- Richard -- Richard Tobin, JANET: R.Tobin@uk.ac.ed AI Applications Institute, ARPA: R.Tobin%uk.ac.ed@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk Edinburgh University. UUCP: ...!ukc!ed.ac.uk!R.Tobin