Xref: utzoo news.groups:19594 comp.windows.misc:1455 comp.windows.x:20797
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!chalmers!appli!niklas
From: niklas@appli.se (Niklas Hallqvist)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.windows.misc,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.windows.openlook
Message-ID: <568@appli.se>
Date: 9 Apr 90 12:50:35 GMT
References: <1990Apr4.015351.25597@dasys1.uucp> <1990Apr5.130434.11677@dasys1.uucp>
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Applitron Datasystem AB, GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: mls@dasys1.uucp's message of 5 Apr 90 13:04:34 GMT


In <1990Apr5.130434.11677@dasys1.uucp> Michael Siemon writes:
> ... My
> own preference is for a single openlook group, independent of the X11
> groups.

	Well, why not create a root group for Graphical User Interfaces (GUI)
named comp.gui and make off-springs for every often-discussed GUI, like
comp.gui.openlook, comp.gui.pm, comp.gui.mac etc.?  This newsgroup structure
would encapsulate "look and feel" discussions.  In the root group would general
GUI discussions reside, like "What feels best, multi-clicking on one mouse
button vs. single-clicking on multiple mouse buttons?".

					Niklas