Xref: utzoo comp.windows.x:21033 news.groups:19774
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cruc!julie
From: julie@cruc.UUCP (Julie Spiegler)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,news.groups
Subject: Re: proposed comp.windows subgroups (was XView/Motif)
Message-ID: <18@cruc.UUCP>
Date: 13 Apr 90 17:24:40 GMT
References: <4166@trwind.UUCP> <9003281348.AA18489@crc.skl.dnd.ca> <5622@paperboy.OSF.ORG> <1990Mar30.153448.22291@alphalpha.com> <822@med.Stanford.EDU> <116@gilroy.dec.com> <EMV.90Apr2020553@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Reply-To: julie@cruc.UUCP (Julie Spiegler)
Followup-To: comp.windows.x
Organization: Crucible, Santa Cruz, CA
Lines: 23

In article <EMV.90Apr2020553@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
>So far the roster of comp.windows.x subgroups that I count are:
>
>	comp.windows.x.xannounce -- announcements from X consortium
>	comp.windows.x.motif -- Motif widget set
>	comp.windows.x.xview -- XView widget set
>	comp.terminals.x -- X terminals
>
>There has been discussion on these for a while, I suspect that these
>names are good enough to work with.  
>

Our news feed seems to be done right now, so there's probably been
some discussion (and the call for votes?) that I've missed.

Many people (including me) would like to see a subgroup dedicated
to porting issues (what does this compiler error mean, fix #793 is
available, etc.).  Will xannounce include this traffic?  If not,
please create an additional subgroup for administration/porting/source.

Thanks,
julie spiegler
{ucscc.ucsc.edu/com, uunet}!cruc!julie