Xref: utzoo soc.motss:27468 sci.med.aids:1837
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!bondc@spdcc.com
From: bondc@spdcc.com (Asmodeus)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,sci.med.aids
Subject: Re: President Bush's speech
Message-ID: <33988@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 7 Apr 90 18:43:32 GMT
References: <33683@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <33750@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <33784@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <33838@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU
Reply-To: bondc@ursa-major.spdcc.com (Asmodeus)
Organization: Naked Under Leather
Lines: 25
Approved: phil@wubios.wustl.edu
Copyright:	Copyright 1990 by Daniel R. Greening.  All rights reserved.
Copyright:	The sci.med.aids newsgroup may be reproduced freely for
Copyright:	non-commercial use only.
Archive-number: 1941

In article <33838@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> wolves.uucp!ggw@mcnc.org (Gregory G. Woodbury) writes:

>        Promiscuity is having multiple sex partners over a relatively short
>period of time WITHOUT regard for the consequences.

No.  Promiscuity is having more sex than you.
It is a useless term for any productive discussion
of any issue, though lots of people find it quite
useful for implying that they have "higher" morals
than others.

>In NO WAY do I mean to
>imply that gay==promiscuous!

It really doesn't matter.  The word is always self-
congratulatory, always judgemental, always offensive,
whoever it is arbitrarily applied to.

Queers should know better, eh?

Fuck no.

-- 
"Ti soffoca il sangue? Muori, dannato!  Muori!  Muori!"
                      ^------------More Philistine bait