Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!military From: kp74615@nokikana.tut.fi (Karri Tapani Palovuori) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Finnish arms Message-ID: <15574@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 14 Apr 90 04:11:05 GMT References: <15491@cbnews.ATT.COM> Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland Lines: 39 Approved: military@att.att.com From: kp74615@nokikana.tut.fi (Karri Tapani Palovuori) In article <15491@cbnews.ATT.COM> SHUEE%IUCF.BITNET@UICVM.uic.edu writes: > > Could our friends in Finnland please tell us about the reliablity and over- >all impresions of the Soviet made weapons they use? I have heard lot's of >stories, but not from anybody who has gotten to use or be around a wide cross >section of both eastern and western equipment. Thank's >SHUEE@IUCF The sole reason for buying Soviet weapons is politics. That should say it all. Soviet equipment are VERY robust. The idea: the guns fire every time, where the grenade hits isn't so important. Well actually they don't fire every time ;-) Typically Soviet arms, vehicles etc. are both designed and constructed poorly. One example I learned to know during my army time, was Soviet 'armoured' (what a joke) attack vehicle BTR-60. The armour stops rifle bullets - sometimes. The only exits are on the roof (and it was designed for fast commando transportations). The engine(s) deliver 180 horse powers. You can figure out how much that is when the vehicle weights 11 tons!!! Imagine your car (let's say 1000 kg) with 16 horse powers. Oh yes, and it consumes 200 liters of 92 oct gasoline per 100 km. When driving on road! And that was only one example. Very often Soviet equipment are modified HEAVILY by us to make them usable. After all, we didn't get them free. For defence purposes we have western (including Finnish) equipment. Karri P.S. Read the book 'Cold Will' by (some NATO general, can't remember the name) and find out what makes us strong. We have beated the Soviets two times now. We will beat them the third time, if necessary.