Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pilchuck!seahcx!phred!petej
From: petej@phred.UUCP (Pete Jarvis)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Blowing up the Shuttle
Message-ID: <3035@phred.UUCP>
Date: 9 Apr 90 18:07:59 GMT
References: <10556.1574.forumexp@mts.rpi.edu> <1990Apr5.035158.23244@utzoo.uucp> <10884@portia.Stanford.EDU> <1990Apr7.221851.14080@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: petej@phred.UUCP (Pete Jarvis)
Organization: <1990Apr7.221851.14080@utzoo.uucp>o
Lines: 10

In article <1990Apr7.221851.14080@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>
>report points them out.  A good bit of the orbiter was reconstructed from
>salvaged debris, and probably most of it could have been if recovery
>efforts had been more persistent.

Challenger debris recovery went on until sometime in June. How much more
persistent would you have them be?

Peter Jarvis..........