Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Yet Another Upgrade Anecdote
Message-ID: <+=A3TR4xds13@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 8 May 90 13:17:22 GMT
References: <43777@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <1161.263f4987@gp.govt.nz> <23254.26434102@ccavax.camb.com> <1990May6.133250.18193@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <385@newave.UUCP> <1215@mtxinu.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 8

In article <1215@mtxinu.UUCP> shore@mtxinu.com (Melinda Shore) writes:
> I do believe that this is looking at the situation backward.  This
> practice makes it clear the extent to which DEC was overcharging for
> the uVax II.

Mt Xinu sells software, right? How much does Mt. Xinu charge for a
single product? Do they have a flat rate for everything, since the
marginal cost of a tape is the same no matter what's on it?
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.      <peter@ficc.uu.net>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Commercial solicitation *is* accepted by email to this address.