Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Mike Feldman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: On quitting an Iterator Prematurely
Keywords: Modeling
Message-ID: <1823@sparko.gwu.edu>
Date: 1 May 90 16:09:37 GMT
References: <9004262133.AA06607@hac2arpa.hac.com> <7050@fy.sei.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu ()
Organization: The George Washington University, Washington D.C.
Lines: 17

In article <7050@fy.sei.cmu.edu> rsd@sei.cmu.edu (Richard S D'Ippolito) writes:
>
>(*) Yes, you can define one as an ADT, and at least one inplementation of
>Pascal has the first as successor to last, but this means the bar is now the
>exception!  Isn't it better to aviod philosophical arguments as to which is
>fundamental, more useful, or prevalent, and define them both as natural
>components?
This is a nice idea. Does anyone know if there was an Ada9x suggestion to
provide this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Michael Feldman
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
The George Washington University
Washington, DC 20052
+1-202-994-5253
mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------