Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: "Broken" compilers
Message-ID: <12770@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 3 May 90 12:05:56 GMT
References: <1990Apr25.165602.974@craycos.com> <1990Apr26.125851.20728@contact.uucp> <1626@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <16582@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1640@tkou02.enet.dec.com> <5776@buengc.BU.EDU>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory
Lines: 7

In article <5776@buengc.BU.EDU> bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>So, a letter from Tom Plum, Vice Chair of Technical
>Committee X3J11, is about as formal as it gets.

NO!!  Tom Plum is no more able to issue official X3J11 interpretations
of the ANSI Standard than I am.  I've described several times how to
go about getting an official interpretation ruling.