Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!digibd!steve
From: steve@digibd (Steve Wahl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: ..Most Excellent
Message-ID: <1990May7.184749.20324@digibd>
Date: 7 May 90 18:47:49 GMT
References: <18017@snow-white.udel.EDU>
Reply-To: steve@digibd.UUCP (Steve Wahl)
Organization: Digiboard Incorporated, St. Louis Park, MN
Lines: 22

In article <18017@snow-white.udel.EDU> CCUCARD%indsvax1.bitnet@uicvm.uic.edu (Paul Cardwell) writes:
>
>
>
>        I have used an Amiga 3000 (4/28/90).
>        YES! Its awesome!  Fast!
>        The Workbench 2.0 is REAL professional.

Could someone who has seen the 3000 tell how it compares with a
2500/30?  Especially one with a comparable hardware setup (similar HD,
Flicker Fixer maybe).  I'd like to know just how much of a jump has
been made here.  Do there exist any 1.4/2.0 Beta testers that ran 2.0
on a 2500/30 and have seen the 3000 and would like to post opinions on
the differences??? :-)

--> Steve

-- 

Steve Wahl               uunet!digibd!steve
DigiBoard Inc.
St. Louis Park, MN       (612) 922-8055