Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Future of Amiga
Summary: boo-boo
Message-ID: <24913@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 9 May 90 23:29:09 GMT
References: <2363@ucqais.uc.edu> <10176@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <2873@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <1990Apr29.231644.11461@uunet!unhd> <10232@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (David C. Navas)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 18

In article <10232@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> riley@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) writes:
>Not enough to make it CD quality.  16 bits at 14 KHz won't do, and it's
>going to be awhile before we see the custom chips running at 44.1 KHz.

Well, as the custom chips run just a bit faster (oh, couple hundred?),
I don't think it'll be that long :)

Actually, if they do the new custom chips *right* (twice data path, twice
speed), 16 bit 44KHz sound is just about where the new hardware would
spec in...

Summary: I think you made a boo-boo.  KHz, not MHz... :) :)

>-Dan Riley (riley@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu, cornell!batcomputer!riley)
>-Wilson Lab, Cornell University

David Navas                                   navas@cory.berkeley.edu
"Excuse my ignorance, but I've been run over by my train of thought."  -me