Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!haven!aplcen!jhunix!barrett
From: barrett@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Dan Barrett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A3000 Memory
Message-ID: <5127@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU>
Date: 2 May 90 18:28:08 GMT
References: <1990Apr26.003754.13905@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <11099@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1990Apr26.234239.25763@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <11171@cbmvax.commodore.com> <2970@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <11219@cbmvax.commodore.com> <JITA.90May2175745@polaris.utu.fi>
Reply-To: barrett@jhunix.UUCP (Dan Barrett)
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Lines: 18

In article <JITA.90May2175745@polaris.utu.fi> jita@polaris.utu.fi (Marko Katajisto) writes:
>How disturbing the interlace in 960 mode (1024 in PAL?) actually is? Is it
>as bad as the flicker in 512 mode?

	No, it isn't.  It looks sort of like little ants "crawling" or water
"flowing" up the vertical lines.  There's little or no "shaking" or "jitter"
like the 400-line interlace you're used to.

	At least this was how Workbench 2.0 looked to me in super-hires
interlaced mode.

                                                        Dan

 //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
| Dan Barrett, Department of Computer Science      Johns Hopkins University |
| INTERNET:   barrett@cs.jhu.edu           |                                |
| COMPUSERVE: >internet:barrett@cs.jhu.edu | UUCP:   barrett@jhunix.UUCP    |
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////