Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!unido!mpirbn!p554mve From: p554mve@mpirbn.UUCP (Michael van Elst) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: Cheap CPU cache (was Re: A500/14 MHz 68k?) Message-ID: <948@mpirbn.UUCP> Date: 3 May 90 10:13:00 GMT References: <8903@chaph.usc.edu> <10630@cbmvax.commodore.com> <3596@pikes.Colorado.EDU> <3673@minyos.xx.rmit.oz> <943@mpirbn.UUCP> Reply-To: p554mve@mpirbn.UUCP (Michael van Elst) Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn Lines: 17 In article brent@asparagine.phri.nyu.edu (Brent Hobbs) writes: >In article <943@mpirbn.UUCP> p554mve@mpirbn.UUCP (Michael van Elst) writes: >> A second approach does give about 70-80% speedup on average programs and >> will affect kickstart operations as well. This is a cache for the CPU. >Would you care to post the design for such a beast? BTW, where are >you getting your performance figures? Anyone out there done this? The design is published in the german magazine 'ST Computer' from 'Markt&Technik'. It has been tested with some calculation intensive programs: a raytracer, a mandelbrot generator and a DTP program called 'Calamus'. -- Michael van Elst UUCP: universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."