Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Problem with CreateProc & LoadSeg
Message-ID: <5663@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 6 May 90 16:06:04 GMT
References: <1677@mindlink.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 12

In article <1677@mindlink.UUCP> a464@mindlink.UUCP (Bruce Dawson) writes:
> These are the
> assumption that CreateProc() will continue to return the address of the
> message port

Since it's more or less documented as doing this, and since changing this
would break so much working code, this is pretty safe.
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
/      \
\_.--._/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape somewhere!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'