Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!nuchat!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Problem with CreateProc & LoadSeg
Message-ID: <5674@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 8 May 90 17:34:06 GMT
References: <897@tau.sm.luth.se> <1856@dialog.sub.org> <5662@sugar.hackercorp.com> <482@oregon.oacis.org>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 19

In article <482@oregon.oacis.org> jmeissen@oregon.oacis.org (John Meissen) writes:
> In article <5662@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
> >No, the clean way to do this is to send a workbench message. I published a

> This only works for programs that are written to support being launched from
> Workbench.

ALL programs should be written to support being launched from either the
Workbench or the CLI, so this translates to "this only works for non-buggy
programs". Which is fine by me. The CLI startup environment is a crock
anyway.

And, of course, if you're writing the launchee as well as the launcher you can
go wild...
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
/      \
\_.--._/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape somewhere!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'