Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Programming differences between 2.0 and 1.3
Message-ID: <5675@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 9 May 90 00:04:43 GMT
References: <8aDCJNG00WB7Q_wUMI@andrew.cmu.edu> <11417@cbmvax.commodore.com> <8790@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 16

Well, Hackercorp finally has our beta release (yea, how's that for speed!), and
I'm seriously impressed. Great stuff, Commodore. Impressive software. Now I go
into waiting mode until the real thing comes out and I find out how much it's
going to be to upgrade. In the meantime, expect lots of questions...

There will not be any Browser 2.0. Workbench 2.0 seems to have everything I
could possibly want. There might, however, be a compatibility library to add
some of the 2.0 DOS calls to 1.3... you see, I had to implement quite a few
of them to get Browser working. Going over my source code and the Autodocs
together is sort of like deja-vu all over again (hey, Boo-Boo, where have I
heard THAT one before?).
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
/      \
\_.--._/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape somewhere!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'