Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!prls!pyramid!weitek!amdcad.amd.com!pepsi!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: VT320
Message-ID: <1990May3.194712.19058@bach.amd.com>
Date: 3 May 90 19:47:12 GMT
References: <13680001@acf5.NYU.EDU> <5777@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@bach.amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 14

In article <5777@bgsuvax.UUCP> denbeste@bgsuvax.UUCP (William C. DenBesten) writes:
|From article <13680001@acf5.NYU.EDU>, by mitsolid@acf5.NYU.EDU (Thanasis Mitsolides):
|> Do you know how a vt320 is better than a vt102?
|> Any info would be appreciated.
|
|The 320 is a much more comfortable terminal to use.

Maybe it was just me or a bad batch, but when I moved from a 220 to
a 320, I had eye problems. Something about the screen strained my
eyes much faster. Anyone else feel this effect?

--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
Government: organized crime with an attitude.