Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!me!rwh
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
From: rwh@me.utoronto.ca (Russell Herman)
Subject: Re: 386 configuration confusion
Message-ID: <90May2.214812edt.20188@me.utoronto.ca>
Organization: none
References: <1990Apr30.185657.27512@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <1375@sdrc.UUCP>
Date: 3 May 90 01:48:21 GMT

In article <1375@sdrc.UUCP> scjones@sdrc.UUCP (Larry Jones) writes:
>On the contrary, everything I've seen lately indicates that ESDI
>is much more popular than SCSI for IBM-AT bus machines.

Another ESDI vs. SCSI issue which I recently learned painfully is that
[at least some] SCSI controllers have a hunk of BIOS living above 640K.
This will eat into what can be loaded high with QEMM or 386^MAX.

Russ Herman
INTERNET: rwh@me.utoronto.ca  UUCP: ..uunet!utai!me!rwh