Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!nosc!crash!pnet01!jca From: jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: INFO needed for MFM, SCSI, IDE drive Message-ID: <2575@crash.cts.com> Date: 8 May 90 05:36:08 GMT Sender: root@crash.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA Lines: 50 khioe@mona.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Kent Hioe) writes: > >1. Does any one know if we can install SCSI disk drive with MFM controller > (WD1006V) ? Yes. The actual nuts and bolts of doing it varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer, but it can be done. >2. Can we install MFM (controller + disk drive) as drive 1 and > SCSI (controller + disk drive) as drive 2 on the same machine > (386) ? Drive 2 meaning the drive 2 in your BIOS? If that's the case, no. The reason being that SCSI is not supported in any motherboard BIOS chip (only exception are those odd ball motherboards that have an on-board SCSI port, and there are a few of them). The SCSI host adaptor will have its own on-board BIOS and how the logical drives are mapped varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer. >3. Can we install MFM (controller + disk drive) as drive 1 and > IDE (controller + disk drive) as drive 2 on the same machine (386) ? No. The specifications for IDE (according to the Seagate IDE installation guide) calls for either an ST412/506 or an IDE in your machine, but NEVER both. You choose one or the other. Now I have been thinking since an IDE generally appears to be a WD1006V-MM1 to the BIOS, what if I hang a WD1006V-MM1 in my machine, but at the secondary port addresses? Would that work? That I don't know yet. I may call Western Digital and ask one of there application engineers if that will work. I also called ALR about using an IDE and a WD1006V-MM1 with Novell Netware (this was back in the days when I was totally ignorant of what the hell IDE was)...and it's a no no. The spec for IDE calls for either an ST412/506 or an IDE installed in your machine, NEVER both. But I am thinking if I can get around it with the secondary port setting on the ST412/506 controller which may just work. If my crazy idea will work, then you need an OS that will talk to the controller at the secondary port address. I know Xenix will do it, but you have to make sure that both controllers are running off int 15 which usually means soldering a lead to the int 15 connection on your motherboard. // JCA /* **--------------------------------------------------------------------------* ** Flames : /dev/null | Xenix is the ONLY thing ** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca@nosc.mil | Microsoft did right. ** INTERNET: jca@pnet01.cts.com ** UUCP : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hd-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca **--------------------------------------------------------------------------* */