Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!uwm.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!lanl!hsv
From: hsv@lanl.gov (Henry S Vaccaro)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: Re: RS/6000 survey - will post summary
Summary: Ignore any comments if not for 9013
Keywords: Time to get some real-world opinions
Message-ID: <50279@lanl.gov>
Date: 4 May 90 14:00:11 GMT
References: <11111@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Organization: Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, N.M.
Lines: 13

In article <11111@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>, mseidle@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Mike Seidle) writes:
> I'd like to gather some opinions on the RS/6000.  Please clarify which
> model(s) you have experience with, and just what that experience has been
> (good,bad).  From what I've read in c.s.i.pc.rt, I would be led to believe


Any comments you get on AIX releases prior to 9013 will probably be rather
misleading.  9013 fixes many problems, and adds a lot of missing functionality.
The kernel in 9013 is supposed to be "near gold", tho I have been told that 
there are still later revisions in house at IBM.

	Hank Vaccaro
	hsv@lanl.gov