Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!apple!mgchow From: mgchow@Apple.COM (Mike Chow) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: X Window Emulator for the Mac Keywords: X, Apple Message-ID: <40738@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 4 May 90 17:06:24 GMT References: <20489@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <722@limbo.Intuitive.Com> <1990May4.121905.16042@granite.cr.bull.com> Distribution: usa Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA Lines: 44 In article <1990May4.121905.16042@granite.cr.bull.com> deangeli@granite.cr.bull.com (Douglas J. DeAngelis) writes: >I feel the need to make another point about the differences between MacX >and eXodus: > >1) Apple lists A/UX as one of its system requirements for running MacX > or X11. This may at first seem logical, but there is no fundamental > reason to tie these together. eXodus makes no such requirement, and > for people who are just looking to turn a few Macs around the site > into Xterms, this requirement could add significantly to the cost > (especially considering the Apple view that the extended functionality > of 2.0 will command significantly more cash flow than previous versions...) > Sorry, but you're confused about MacX. MacX will run on both MacOS and A/UX, and the real beauty is that the same MacX binary is used in both enrivonments. You don't have to have A/UX to run MacX. Another point is that MacX allows you to use a Macintosh Window manager for your X windows, allowing very nice integration with the Macintosh desktop. >2) eXodus is an R4 server that works _today_. The R4 server that Apple > has announced (called X11 for A/UX), in their words, "takes over the > console display". Another minor ;-) point is that it doesn't work yet. > Crashing UNIX systems on a routine basis is much less pleasant than a > normal, friendly Mac crash. I'm confused here. First of all, as far as I know, Apple has not shipped an X server based on R4. So, are you talking about the R4 sample server from MIT? If you're talking about unreleased/unsupported software, your comment that it "doesn't work yet" isn't very relevant in the context of products that a company ships and supports. I also don't understand your point about "Crashing UNIX systems on a routine basis", since the X11 server from Apple runs as a user process. It possible for ANY UNIX X server to crash, but a user process that crashes won't kill the UNIX kernel. > >-- >========================================================================== >Douglas J. DeAngelis Bull Worldwide Information Systems >deangeli@granite.cr.bull.com 300 Concord Road MA30-852A >(508) 671-2552 Billerica, MA 01821 Mike Chow mgchow@apple.com