Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!daveo
From: daveo@Apple.COM (David M. O'Rourke)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: The Amiga 3000--what does it mean for the Mac?
Message-ID: <40745@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 4 May 90 18:46:01 GMT
References: <20660@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 20


  In my *PERSONAL* (read this isn't apple saying this) opinion it doesn't
mean anything until they get some software standards that the business
community is willing to accept.  The Mac's had a hard enough time being
accepted by businesses.  Until Commador loses it's "game machine" image,
acurate or not, I don't think it means much.

  The Amiga doesn't have near the software industry support that the Mac
enjoy's, and the software industry doesn't recieve the support from
Commador that Mac developer's enjoy.  So until those two problem get fixed
Commador can come out with hardware all it wants...

  But that's just *MY* opinion...
-- 
daveo@apple.com                                               David M. O'Rourke

"Hey where'd you learn to shoot like that?" ... "At the 7-11."
     -- Marty McFly (Back to the future III)
_______________________________________________________________________________
I do not speak for Apple in any official sense.