Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!bungi.com!news
From: ian@sibyl.eleceng.ua.oz.au
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: To clarify further unclarified issues..
Message-ID: <9005091719.375@munnari.oz.au>
Date: 9 May 90 16:47:51 GMT
References: <<9005091412.AA08363@meepmeep.pcs.com>>
Sender: news@daver.bungi.com
Lines: 16
Approved: news@daver.bungi.com

Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
 > My earlier "call for a consortium" among UNIX developers was aimed
 > strictly at banding together that small group of folk (less than 5% of the
 > pc532 owners, I'd say) who are bent on going their own way, for whatever
 > reason. The majority of you seem to be happy enough to go along with
 > Dave in his efforts to get SYSV, which I applaud and hope succeed, and that
 > is fine.

Well, what I *really* would like is mach.

Dave, is this true about getting SYSV? Last I heard you asked who was
interested in what, then posted saying "No promises, but I may be able to
get Unix". Not an exact quote, but I am pretty sure that which sort of
unix was left unspecified. In any case what is the progress?

Ian Dall