Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sgi!davea@quasar.wpd.sgi.com
From: davea@quasar.wpd.sgi.com (David B. Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: Error from dbx
Summary: old dbx or IRIX ??
Message-ID: <59528@sgi.sgi.com>
Date: 8 May 90 16:47:59 GMT
References: <9005031445.aa07158@VGR.BRL.MIL> <7345@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1957@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Sender: davea@quasar.wpd.sgi.com
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 35

In article <1957@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, joe@etac632 (Joe Fulson-Woytek) writes:
> I am trying to debug a large Fortran program. The program
[ ]
> warning: aux(17) greater than max(16) for file 111
> I then got a core dump. If anyone can point me to a meaning for

E-mail bounced, so I'm posting.

You don't say, but I assume you are still running IRIX release 3.1.

Reason: This dbx core dump is most suggestive of an old version of dbx.

	stdump -n 111 a.out
will show you the symbol table for file 111 in a.out.  Your file 111 will
show just 16 entries in the aux table......

Question:
What does the 4 lines of dbx startup say?
It should say ``dbx version 1.31'' (plus other stuff).

The message means that the aux table (an array of 32-bit unions where data
types are recorded) is being probed at a location greater than exists in
the (local) aux table for the particular source file.     This is nothing
you can do anything about :-(.

Again:  what system version are you using?  If you upgraded to 3.2, did you
recompile *everything*?    As the 3.2 release notes say, dbx cannot deal
with objects which have *any* 3.1 object code.  Any local libraries in
use?  Check them!

Hope this helps.
[ David B. Anderson  Silicon Graphics  (415)335-1548  davea@sgi.com ]
[``What can go wrong?''                          --Calvin and Hobbes]

PS: This should be handled through the Hotline or e-mail.....Thanks.