Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:4694 comp.unix.xenix:11339
Path: utzoo!attcan!lsuc!ecicrl!robohack!woods
From: woods@robohack.UUCP (Greg A. Woods)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Layers
Keywords: SCO UNIX Layers Ersatz Job Contrl
Message-ID: <1990May2.151242.263@robohack.UUCP>
Date: 2 May 90 15:12:42 GMT
References: <940@s8.Morgan.COM>
Organization: R. H. Lathwell Associates:  Elegant Communications, Inc.
Lines: 26

In article <940@s8.Morgan.COM> amull@Morgan.COM (Andrew P. Mullhaupt) writes:
> I'm beginning to use Layers with SCO UNIX System V/386 r3.2;
> since I can't seem to get the terminal to do multiscreens. (It's
> a PC emulating any one of about five terminals, I thought the
> best chance for multiscreens was a Wyse50, but no go...)

[ a wyse-50 isn't much good for anything, unless you are replacing a
DEC vt52, and don't need any more functionality ]

> The Layers work OK, but I have experienced a Double PANIC twice

Are you talking about layers, or shell layers (i.e. shl)?  There's a
big difference, and I'd be surprised to find out SCO had layers.  I'd
be even more surprised if you found a Wyse terminal which understood
layers!

Yes shl and the sxt drivers (i.e. shell layers) are known to be buggy
in several implementations.  I cannot comment on SCO Unix, though I've
had problems in other 386 implementations of SysVr3.2.  SCO Xenix had
several problems with the sxt drivers interacting badly with other tty
drivers.
-- 
						Greg A. Woods

woods@{robohack,gate,eci386,tmsoft,ontmoh}.UUCP
+1 416 443-1734 [h]   +1 416 595-5425 [w]   VE3-TCP   Toronto, Ontario; CANADA