Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maxed!root From: root@maxed (0000-Admin(0000)) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: mkfs gap option Message-ID: <1990May2.144452.4208@maxed> Date: 2 May 90 14:44:52 GMT References: <511590@nstar.UUCP< <1990Apr19.025739.19180@nebulus.UUCP> <1990Apr29.000503.10934@nebulus.UUCP> <715@bilver.UUCP> Sender: maxed!ed Organization: American Micro Group, Ft. Lee, NJ Lines: 31 In article <715@bilver.UUCP> bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion) writes: >In article < > dennis@nebulus.UUCP ><(Dennis S. Breckenridge) writes: >< >< pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) writes: >< >< >Essentially the gap size depends on rotational speed of the disc >< >(virtually a constant), and on interrupt latency and IO operation >< ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What is this? Different drives have DIFFERENT >< speeds. Even the same supplier does NOT adhere to the same speeds. >< ><(slower, they have a limit in the state changes/sec. of their > >And just last week I was looking over the specs on the current Shugart lines, >and there were 3 different drive rotational speeds listed. > >All were SCSI drives. Since we just talk to the host in SCSI land it really >doesn't make any difference to us. And many of the new SCSI's are using zone >bit recording - so we don't know much about the data, execpt it's block #. Many of the new 20 and 25 MHz ESDI & SCSI drives are turning at 5400 rpm. Latency and access times are reduced. Can't count on 3600 any more. -- Ed Whittemore uunet!maxed!ed American Micro Group 201 944 3293