Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!arizona!mat
From: mat@zeus.opt-sci.arizona.edu (Mat Watson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: 386 Motherboards
Message-ID: <MAT.90May2214726@zeus.megaron.arizona.edu>
Date: 3 May 90 04:47:27 GMT
References: <15966@cbnews.ATT.COM> <332@hub.cs.jmu.edu> <883@sixhub.UUCP> <292@zds-ux.UUCP> <898@sixhub.UUCP>
Organization: University of Arizona Optical Sciences Center
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP's message of 2 May 90 22:37:54 GMT

I've been following this thread about cache hits with some interest,
and I'd like to ask you guys a couple questions:

Since *nix swaps entire jobs ( which I assume are larger than the
cache ), doesn't that screw up the hit rate?

And:

What makes the Logix board without cache different from other boards
without cache?

--Mat             mat@zeus.opt-sci.arizona.edu [128.196.128.219]
...{allegra,cmcl2,hao!noao}!arizona!zeus.opt-sci.arizona.edu!mat
Optical Sciences Center, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA