Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!bdgltd!ela From: ela@bdgltd.UUCP (Ed Ackerman Programmer) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: 2nd call to vote comp.unix.sco, undecided? PLEAD READ! Keywords: comp.unix.sco call votes sco Message-ID: <152@bdgltd.UUCP> Date: 3 May 90 16:46:57 GMT References: <1990Apr26.173835.26100@ico.isc.com> <511640@nstar.UUCP> <382@comcon.UUCP> Reply-To: ela@.UUCP (Ed Ackerman Programmer) Organization: BDG Ltd. Lines: 20 In article <382@comcon.UUCP> tim@comcon.UUCP (Tim Brown) writes: > >Personally I have benifited time and time again from the mix in this >group. Unix is unix and we all (as in all brands) help each other and >benifit from the association. I say we leave it the way it is. > Amen, brother. Since, according to the last figures I saw, SCO has a majority of the installed/sold systems (Xenix) why bother? It's bad enough that I have wade through 3 or 4 groups to get answers now. Isn't the whole point of OSF/UI to eliminate all the differing versions of Unix out there? Why when the Unix vendors are starting to get their act together, are we arguing about spliting a group off? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ed Ackerman | It is impossible to make anything bdgltd!ela@dsi.com or ...!dsinc!bdgltd!ela| foolproof beacause fools are #include | SO ingenious!