Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!milano!uudell!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Come on, stop blaming/flaming SCO!
Message-ID: <K.73T1Exds13@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 4 May 90 19:23:36 GMT
References: <216@pcssc.UUCP> <1990Apr26.173835.26100@ico.isc.com> <544@isipc.UUCP> <839@visenix.UUCP> <1990Apr30.233248.24317@ico.isc.com> <218@pcssc.UUCP> <6005@scolex.sco.COM> <2237@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <229@pcssc.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 6

In article <229@pcssc.UUCP> dma@pcssc.UUCP (Dave Armbrust) writes:
> Lets take Lyrix as an example. ... comp.unix.sco.lyrix I beleive would make
> more sense then comp.unix.i386.apps.lyrix.

And since Lyrix isn't locked into SCO, comp.unix.apps.lyrix makes even
more sense.
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.      <peter@ficc.uu.net>
 'U`  Have you hugged your wolf today?  <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
@FIN  Commercial solicitation *is* accepted by email to this address.